Loyalty marketing agency ICLP has published a new white paper that aims to help technology vendors identify areas in which relationships with their channel partners can be made more profitable.
Channel partners provide a primary route to market for most technology vendors who see targeted investment in channel activities as one of the most effective methods to influence behaviour and performance.
But, given that vendors cannot generally afford to offer the same level of contact to all their partners, they need to make a number of choices about the level of support they offer, and to whom. According to ICLP, achieving the right balance for cost-effective distribution is critical to success.
In an indirect relationship with the end customer, the vendor (as a manufacturer) does not always share the same perspective as the channel partner (as a reseller, retailer or advisor to end-users).
Each often claims the others do not fully understand their business, so it is common for vendors to complain about partners' take-up and performance in channel programmes, while channel partners begrudge the time and effort required to participate in these programmes. In short, simplifying these programmes' processes is a vital channel partner priority.
Vendor channel programmes aim to drive incremental channel partner behaviour, but one approach cannot cover all sectors because channel partners come in all shapes and sizes. For example, they may be:
Well-designed channel programmes need to address the needs of these different partner types who aim in turn to serve different clusters of buying customers. When they fail to take these into account, channel initiatives can be ineffective with limited ROI.
As a result, vendors need to take steps to better align their arsenal of channel initiatives more closely with the needs of their individual channel partners. By aligning more effectively vendors and channel partners can build a WIN WIN situation to achieve their defined goals. Where those goals are misaligned, channel funds are likely to be misapplied.
There are four critical steps which have been identified that have a major influence on the overall performance of a channel programme. These steps are described in detail in the full white paper, and should help vendors to optimise their relationships with channel partners:
The vendor's success metrics should be driven by the overall goals of their business and not by the competition or by industry standards. They serve as the measurement of progress and should be agreed within the vendor's business at the outset. The vendor needs to select those success metrics which are measurable, match their business model and align with partner needs. While the bottom line will always be key other, 'soft' factors such as training or marketing support will also play a role.
According to ICLP, these success metrics can be categorised as either 'hard' or 'soft'. For example, hard success metrics might include:
Soft success metrics typically include:
The full white paper, entitled 'What do you do if your Channel Partners are not performing', has been made available for free download from ICLP's web site - click here
Categorised as: